I don’t think rich pictures can be used to depict everything in a problem situation, I think they are devices for some kind of discrimination – you are actually saying what you think are the important issues, and you have to decide on what’s important according to the purpose the rich picture is being constructed for, for a particular problem situation.In this case my purpose was just to try and gain a general understanding about the miners’ situation.It can be used as a personal device, so you can explore your own understanding. When you begin to put symbols down on paper and to draw the rich picture, you begin to question your own understanding and it can throw up questions for yourself about what you understand and what you don’t understand. It begins to put some structure on the problem situation from your own personal perspective.It’s probably got a number of faults in it, and I think that’s one of the strengths of a rich picture. It makes you begin to declare assumptions, and because you are declaring and discussing those assumptions, they can be challenged by other people. So your understanding of the situation can be explored, challenged and modified by the debate that ensues. The power of a rich picture is that it provokes that kind of debate, there’s a bit of visual interest there that can spark off thought, you can visit the rich picture randomly, you can move around on it which is stimulating for debate in itself.
The third “Elephant Egg” night of pecha kucha style presentations was held at Moana Cafe last Tuesday night. It succeeded in sharing the presenters’ passions with the audience, and giving us some new ideas to think about. See photos on Maui Jeff’s blog.
I just found a great new search engine. You can scan through the results like Apple’s cover flow. Check out http://www.searchme.com/
One night a couple weeks ago, I attended an event called “Elephant Egg,” held at Moana Cafe. Maggie Sutrov‘s invitation promised “Five Presentations by Five Inspiring People.” I recognized the format as pecha kucha, which I’d heard of but never experienced (20 slides shown for 20 seconds each, for a total of 6 minutes and 40 seconds). I was out of town at VizThink for their first event, so I made a point of going to this one. It was defnitely worthwhile!
There were five presentations:
- An outrigger canoe trip to Kure in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, by Peter Nice
- Photos from a trip to India near Nepal (above 15,000 feet!), by Daniel Sullivan
- Likability, by Bob Sommers
- Spiral Dynamics, by Ian Blakeslee
- The future of newspapers, by Maui News reporter Ilima Loomis
The format kept the presentations short and focused, and gave just enough information to be intriguing and open opportunities for questions. They’re planning to hold them every couple months, so the next one will probably be in late June.